15 Feb 2019 17:36 IST

A look at two successful IBC cases in the steel industry

Here’s what happened in the cases of Tata Steel-Bhushan Steel and JSW Steel-Monnet Ispat & Energy

Aggressive expansion plans that forced steel companies to accumulate large piles of debt between 2005 and 2010 spelt doom for many players. Unfavourable demand conditions and high interest costs weighed on many companies, pushing them to declare insolvency under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). For some of the larger players, however, assets priced attractively under the IBC offered a good opportunity to expand and strengthen their capacities in the long run.

Five steel majors — Bhushan Steel, Bhushan Power and Steel, Essar Steel, Electrosteel Steels and Monnet Ispat & Energy — that came for resolution under the IBC constitute more than a sixth (22 million tonnes) of the total crude steel capacity in India. Thus, there have been intense biddings, counter-biddings and fights to acquire these companies. Only three of the companies have seen resolution under IBC, with the rest still caught in endless litigations.

In this article, we take a close look at two of the successful IBC cases in the steel industry — Tata Steel-Bhushan Steel and JSW Steel-Monnet Ispat & Energy.

Tata Steel-Bhushan Steel

Tata Steel’s ₹35,132-crore resolution plan to take over Bhushan Steel’s assets emerged as a flagship case for the IBC resolution process. The resolution was carried out through Tata Steel’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Bamnipal Steel. This enabled Tata Steel to acquire a 72.65 per cent stake in Bhushan Steel.

Before this, Bhushan Steel was operating at a capacity of nearly 3.5 million tonnes per annum (mtpa) and had an installed capacity of about 5.5 mtpa. Though the company was reporting net losses due to a high interest burden, it was profitable at the operating level — an operating profit of about ₹4,000 per tonne of output recorded in FY18.

Bhushan Steel, a predominantly flat steel producer, was expected to consolidate Tata Steel’s position as one of the top flat steel makers. Tata Steel acquired Bhushan Steel on May 18, 2018, consolidating its financial statements from the quarter ending June 2018 (Q1 FY19). That quarter, Bhushan Steel, aided by recovery in the domestic steel market, delivered an operating profit per tonne of ₹9,650, which was more than many peers in the industry.

The operating performance of Bhushan Steel continued to improve under Tata Steel’s management. Revenues and profits have improved notably in the past few quarters. In the recent quarter ended December 2018, Bhushan Steel’s revenue and operating profits were about ₹4,889 crore and ₹1,008 crore respectively, accounting for 12 per cent and 15 per cent of Tata Steel’s revenue (₹41,220 crore) and operating profit (₹6,734 crore). The operating profit per tonne of Bhushan Steel now stands at ₹10,992.

JSW Steel-Monnet Ispat

The resolution plan of JSW Steel to acquire Monnet Ispat is different. The former joined hands with a private equity firm, AION Capital, and infused ₹2,875 crore in the latter. This gave JSW Steel a shareholding of 23.1 per cent, which was treated as an investment in a joint venture. This enabled the incomes earned or losses incurred from the joint venture to be adjusted in the value of investment. Therefore, Monnet Ispat’s incomes and assets have not been consolidated in JSW Steel’s financial statements.

Before acquisition, Monnet Ispat’s performance was dismal. In 2011, it increased its debt to fund capacity expansion. The company’s debt stood at ₹12,262 crore towards the end of FY17. It has consistently been recording losses since FY15, eroding its net worth in the process. The company has a 1.5 mtpa of finished steel making capacity near Raigarh, Chhatisgarh, and is also in the business of mining coal and iron ore.

At the time of acquisition, JSW Steel aimed to turn around Monnet Ispat in three phases. Phase 1 includes commissioning of a billet plant, sinter plant, blast furnace, caster and TMT bar mill, which were in operation earlier but were closed at the time of acquisition. Phases 2 and 3 include ramping up the finished steel plant to a capacity of 1.5 million tonnes and beyond. JSW Steel is in the process of completing phases 1 and 2, which it expects to complete by the end of next financial year.

As Monnet Ispat is smaller than JSW Steel, profit contribution from the former at the operating level does not exceed 5 per cent of JSW Steel’s consolidated operating profit.

Recommended for you
/* article author desc short */