Reforms in higher education and boosting the government’s skill agenda have been the spotlight in this year’s Budget. Apart from setting up a Higher Education Financing Agency (HEFA) with an initial capital base of ₹1,000 crore, another positive that has been welcomed widely is the allocation of ₹1,700 crore to set up 1,500 multi-skill training institutes across the country which will basically be the new generation ITIs set up in PPP mode.
Read: Union Budget 2016-17 This time for Bharat
Here are some of the reactions to the Budget proposals from education sector that followed after the announcements are listed here:
The announcement that enabling regulatory architecture will be provided to 10 public and 10 private institutions to emerge as world-class teaching institutions should be acclaimed for two key reasons. First, it seeks to recognise the role of the private sector — not all world-class institutions that emerge from India need to be publicly funded.
Second, it stresses the importance of teaching. Often, in most higher education institutions, research gets top priority. However, only a fraction of students in the higher education system take up research. For the vast majority of students who prepare for careers in industry, inspired teaching would be invaluable."
— Thillai Rajan, Associate Professor, Dept of Management Studies, Indian Institute of Technology Madras (IITM)
The complexity of the Indian educational challenge calls for greater involvement of private sector capital and expertise. However, the Budget is silent on measures to further boost private sector investment in the education."
— Deepak Mehrotra, Managing Director, Pearson India
The HEFA, with an initial capital base of ₹,1000 crore, supplemented funds from the market and CSR funds, is a good concept. However, it is not at all clear which “top institutions” would be lucky to get their infrastructure serviced through these funds. Moreover, what are the criterion to define a top institution? Why should the market or corporations lend to these institutes unless they cater to some of their requirements? Would the borrowings by HEFA be guaranteed by the Government? Again, these are questions that one awaits further clarity on.
At the same time, limiting the benefit of deduction on research to corporates to 150 per cent in FY17, and subsequently down to 100 per cent by FY20, does not bode well in terms of encouraging innovation.
Amidst all these, the proposal to establish the digital depository for academic certificates stands out as innovative as it will certainly save a lot of inconvenience, both to students and employers in proving and accepting the authenticity of certificates."
— Manas Paul, Professor (EEP) Institute of Management Technology Ghaziabad
We also welcome the decision to set up a Higher Education Financing Agency (HEFA) with an initial capital base of ₹1,000 crore. Currently, top-tier, privately managed management educations have to finance all capital expenditure, including campus expansion, classroom upgradation, etc., through internal accruals. On the other hand, government-funded IIMs are extended financial support by the government for various capital expenditure initiatives."
— Fr. E. Abraham S.J., Director, XLRI- Xavier School of Management Jamshedpur
The National Skill Assessment & Certification Board with both government and industry representation, will be instrumental in ensuring quality assessment of the skilled workforce that gets trained."
— S. Ramadorai, Chairman, National Skill Development Agency (NSDA) and National Skill Development Corporation (NSDC)
— Manish Mohan, Executive Vice-President, Skills Development Network, Wadhwani Foundation
"Extending tax relief for hiring unemployed with salaries below Rs. 25,000 to the corporate would provide a boost to job creation. While the proposed digital depository for school leaving certificate is a welcome step, a central mechanism to validate skilled population would have been music to many ears."
— Ninad Karpe, MD and CEO, Aptech
"The visionary direction towards Start up India – specially women entrepreneurs will help India move from a country of job seekers to a land of job creators, vital for sustainable economic growth and development."
— Ambarish Datta –MD & CEO BSE Institute Ltd and Director of NSDC (National Skill Development Council)
"FM’s proposal to spread digital literacy in rural India and digitization at various levels in school and high quality world class education finds resonance with Cambridge University Press’s objective to make learner’s future ready and globally compatible. With Education and Job creation as one of the key pillars to transform India and the continued focus on ‘Make in India’, the budget augurs well for the sector."
— Ratnesh Kumar Jha, MD, Cambridge University Press - South Asia
— Naveen Chopra, Founder and Chairman, The Chopras
"While the government’s announcement to open 62 new Navodaya Vidyalayas is fantastic, there could have been a scheme to launch 100 times more schools — that is, 6200 schools — which is what the country requires. All of these don’t need to come from the government sector; the private sector should be allowed to contribute as well."
— Shantanu Prakash, CMD Educomp Solutions
— Anil Sachdev, Founder & CEO, School of Inspired Leadership Gurgaon